custom matlab script for fiber photometry analysis Search Results


custom matlab script for fiber photometry analysis  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc custom matlab script for fiber photometry analysis
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Custom Matlab Script For Fiber Photometry Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom matlab script for fiber photometry analysis/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom matlab script for fiber photometry analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fiber-orientation analysis script for matlab r2013a  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc fiber-orientation analysis script for matlab r2013a
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Fiber Orientation Analysis Script For Matlab R2013a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fiber-orientation analysis script for matlab r2013a/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fiber-orientation analysis script for matlab r2013a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
custom (matlab, fortran)  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc custom (matlab, fortran)
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Custom (Matlab, Fortran), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom (matlab, fortran)/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom (matlab, fortran) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab r2018b  (Tucker-Davis Tech)
90
Tucker-Davis Tech matlab r2018b
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Matlab R2018b, supplied by Tucker-Davis Tech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab r2018b/product/Tucker-Davis Tech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2018b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
custom code matlab r2018b  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc custom code matlab r2018b
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Custom Code Matlab R2018b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom code matlab r2018b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom code matlab r2018b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab 2019b  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab 2019b
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Matlab 2019b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab 2019b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab 2019b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
3d fiber extraction matlab algorithm fire  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc 3d fiber extraction matlab algorithm fire
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
3d Fiber Extraction Matlab Algorithm Fire, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d fiber extraction matlab algorithm fire/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fiber extraction matlab algorithm fire - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber photometry experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Distinct subpopulations of ventral pallidal cholinergic projection neurons encode valence of olfactory stimuli

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114009

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber photometry experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.

Article Snippet: Custom MATLAB script for fiber photometry analysis , This paper , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10723901.

Techniques: Saline, Immunohistochemistry, In Vivo

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Distinct subpopulations of ventral pallidal cholinergic projection neurons encode valence of olfactory stimuli

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114009

Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Article Snippet: Custom MATLAB script for fiber photometry analysis , This paper , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10723901.

Techniques: Virus, Plasmid Preparation, Recombinant, Software